By David Ryser &
Martha Paterik
If
we’re called to walk on the water, then why do we need an ark? (Mark Squires)
These things always seem to begin
innocently enough…just before they spin hopelessly out of control. My friend Martha had run across the term
“sacred desk” referring to the pulpit.
She’d never heard this term before and was somewhat bewildered that
anyone would call a piece of furniture sacred.
And I was reminded of my
grandfather.
My grandfather was a dairy
farmer. At the time of the evening
milking, the cows would be herded into the barn and locked into stalls to be
milked. Behind the cows, a trough was
cut into the floor. The trough was
needed because the cows were not barn-broken.
As the evening wore on, the trough filled with cow waste.
As useful as this trough was, I
never heard my grandfather refer to it as the “sacred trough.”
Referring to the pulpit as the
“sacred desk” makes about as much sense as calling my grandfather’s muck-trough
the “sacred trough.” After all, both are
pretty much full of the same thing.
I explained to Martha that the
pulpit is the Protestant version of the Catholic altar. It can…and has…become just another fixture of
religious idolatry. Pick your poison. Martha noted that religious people have done
much the same thing even with biblical objects.
She mentioned the term “ark.” And I experienced a religious flashback.
Years ago, I was sitting in the Sunday
service at a church whose pastor strongly preached commitment to the Kingdom of God.
By “Kingdom
of God” he meant his
church, which was growing increasingly unhealthy. On this particular morning, the speaker was
proclaiming that this local church was the modern day version of Noah’s ark. This “ark” was the only place of safety in a
world that was becoming increasingly unsafe.
We needed to get into the ark.
And stay in.
I can’t decide if this preacher’s
declaration is more arrogant or stupid.
It’s a big dose of both. For one
thing, it is absurd to assert that any local church is the only place…or even
the best place…where a person can be safe in Christ. What about the almost 8 billion people on the
planet who don’t even know this particular church exists? And are there no other Christian fellowships
where Jesus is Lord?
For another thing, is any ark
intended to be a permanent dwelling place?
What if Noah…and the people and animals with him…had stayed in the ark and
never left it? Would they have been
safe, secure, and blessed? Or would they
have died of hunger, buried in their own waste?
And what about the world they were supposed to populate and subdue?
The ark-church is no
different. If we are ever going to make
a difference in the world…advance God’s kingdom in the earth…we must leave the
ark. This is something that should be
encouraged by church leaders…not discouraged.
So what about the people who leave
the ark-church?
I eventually left it. So did Martha. So did several other people over the
years. Some before us. Any exodus from that local church was treated
as a departure from the Christian faith.
They had “left the ark” and were at risk. We were sternly charged not to follow their
example.
So just when did the word ark come to be a synonym for the word prison anyhow?
Others have continued to jump ship,
so to speak. Those of us who left before
them have made the effort to get in contact with some of these people and
encourage them that there is life outside the ark. I’ve remarked that the question is not so
much whether there is life outside of this ark-church as whether there is life
inside of it.
Martha’s response is instructive.
“I guess the real question is which
ark? The ark of Noah’s day carried all
that represented life in it. They were
fed and kept safe until it was time to be sent out into the world and carry
that life to it. No one [ever] mentions
a regular trek back to the boat. It had
served its purpose, now it was time to go out.”
Wow.
And then she went on to reference another ark…the Ark of the
Covenant. Unlike the pulpit, if any piece of furniture could be called “sacred”
it would be the Ark of the Covenant. She
noted: “It had a thing that represented
life (manna), the miracle staff of Aaron, and the stone tablets. The glory of God even rested on or above this
ark. But He doesn’t anymore. God has left the box, so to speak. He wants us to take His Glory into the world,
to be His Glory.”
You see, both of these arks had been constructed at God’s
direction. And both of them had a
purpose…for a season. When their purpose
was fulfilled, both were emptied. And
the world was benefited because what had once been in the arks was now released
into the world, engaged with it, and bringing life to it.
And in the end, Martha accurately sums
up the fate of both of these biblical arks:
“[B]oth arks were mighty tools of God in the time they were needed; but
at the risk of killing sacred cows, neither would be too effective today.”
I don’t know about you, but I think
sacred cows make great steaks.
Responses to this article are
welcomed. You may contact the author at drdave1545@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment